Energy Institute of Uganda (EIU)

 
Sunday
September
2010
05
 
Newsroom and Events
Oil Search Starts in Murchison Falls Park PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
 
E-mail article Print article

OIL exploration work has started in Murchison Falls National Park. The Canadian-based Heritage Oil and Gas, whose exploration area covers part of the Victoria Nile delta and the Albertan Nile Pakwach basin, has begun seismic surveys that extend into the park. It is a shared operation with the Irish company, Tullow Oil.

According to park officials, the exploration area covers one-quarter of the northern part of the park, which is endowed with endangered wildlife species and rare bird species. It also covers one-third of the southern part of the park.

“There are indications that Murchison Falls National Park and parts of Lake Albert have oil but we need more time and surveys to establish the quantities,” Elly Karuhanga, the president of Tullow Oil Uganda, told The New Vision.
The move is likely to spark off another heated debate between economic players and conservationists.

Murchison Falls National Park, plus the Nile Delta area stretching from the falls to the confluence with Lake Albert, has recently been designated as an internationally protected Ramsar wetland site. In addition, the area has been proposed as a World Heritage site.

But Heritage Oil says it has taken all necessary precautions to protect the wildlife. “We have done an environmental impact assessment for the seismic surveys. We shall do another one before we start drilling,” said official Brian Westwood.

He assured that drilling would only take place in the part of the block outside the park. “There will be no wells in the park. A special committee will oversee the environmental impact of any drilling.”
The committee, he added, would consist of representatives of NEMA, the Uganda Wildlife Authority, the National Forestry Authority, Fisheries, two NGOs and the petroleum partners.

“We are not taking any risks because we are aware this is a world heritage site,” Westwood said.

However, park wardens are worried about the presence of the large number of oil workers moving up and down the park.

“The noise of the automobiles and the teams from the oil companies scare away the animals,” Stonewall Kato, the senior warden in charge of community conservation, told The New Vision.
“In addition, we have recorded at least four dead antelopes as a result of over-speeding to date.”

The environmental impact of the oil exploration in the park was discussed during a meeting organised by the Leadership for Conservation Africa in Paara on Saturday.

“Park authorities are supposed to monitor the conditions spelt out in the environmental impact assessment studies,” commented Dr. Aryamanya Mugisha, the director of NEMA, who participated in the meeting.

“No one has raised the issue of animals being knocked by cars with us. But the Uganda Wildlife Authority has the mandate to stop this malpractice.”

He assured that environmental concerns had been taken care in the assessment studies, which had recommended measures on how to mitigate the negative impact.

 
Members Continous Professional Development Programme. PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 28 August 2007

The Energy Institute of Uganda a membership non profit organization is to conduct a Members' professional Development programme for all its Members.

The “Members Continuous Professional Development (MCPD) programme,is an initiative specifically designed to benefit  the Institute's members.  

The objective of the programme is to equip members’ staff with relevant skills and to promote professionalism in the sector. It will be an in-house programme for one hour on various topics as deemed relevant to the different member companies.

 

EIU will cater for the facilitation of the trainer while the member companies are to provide the venue for the training and mobilize their staff. The programme is to be conducted from  5:00pm to 6:00pm,to avoid interruptions of duties and the member companies are given the previllege of selecting the date. Its free for all staff.

  This initiative that starts next month (September)was developed based on the fact that EIU is committed to professional recognition, technical support provision, education and training service provision and in addition to that, as professionally recognized members of the Institute ,its a  requirement to maintain and develop the currency of knowledge and skills in the field of operation on a professional basis.  

EIU recognizes the importance of MCPD and it is best positioned to serve its members and help them achieve the Continous Professional Development  goals.

 

The Member companies include, Eskom Uganda Limited, Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited, Kobil Uganda Limited, Kakira Sugar Works (1985) Limited, and Makerere University Kampala.

 

EIU has four classes of membership which include Senior corporate, Junior corporate, Associate and individual . These enjoy several benefits like dicounts on training programmes, professional development services,free passes to energy forums and Professional talks among others.

 

Membership is open to all stakeholders in the energy industry and interested members of the public.

 
MANUFACTURERS ASK FOR DIESEL SUBSIDY EXTENSION PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 01 May 2007
Manufacturers want diesel subsidy extended
 
Goods on railway wagons. The cost of transporting goods from Mombasa by railway is increasing steadily

Goods on railway wagons. The cost of transporting goods from Mombasa by railway is increasing steadily

By David Muwanga

THE Uganda Manufacturers Association (UMA) has proposed an extension of the subsidy on diesel generators ahead of the Budget in June.

“We are asking for an extension of the subsidy that ends mid-this year because it is during this period that the planned hydro-power projects with lower tariffs are expected to have become operational,” the association’s executive director, Hillary Obonyo, said.

“The Government should also review the power agreements with the generation, transmission and distribution companies to remove avoidable costs in order to reduce power tariffs and minimise their variations. These are some our proposals to the Budget,” he said in an interview.

Obonyo said the power shortage has contributed to the increase in the costs of production, which went up by about 27%.

“Over the last two years, the cost of power has increased by 200% in addition to being inadequate and of a poor quality, contributing to the increasing costs of doing business,” he explained.

Obonyo said due to the poor infrastructure, transport costs account for 35% of most industries’ production costs.

“For example since 2004, the cost of transport by railway from Mombasa to Kampala increased to $92 (sh158,240) from $75 (sh129,000) per tonne,” he said.

Obonyo said the cost of transporting a 20-foot container by road from Mombasa is over $2,400 (sh4m) for a twenty feet container and $4,100 (sh7m) for a 40-foot container.

“This is against the background that the freight cost for a 20-foot container from Mombasa to Nairobi is only $60 (sh103,200). Again in the last two years, transport costs have gone up,” he said.

“Records show that Uganda has got the highest transportation cost for a landlocked country after Ethiopia. We are asking for intervention. The Government should also set a benchmark for the Rift Valley Railways consortium’s performance,” Obonyo suggested.

Uganda’s interest rates of 19% are the highest in the region compared to less than 10% in Kenya and Tanzania.

Most financial institutions in Uganda restrict credit to local businesses due to poor identification, inadequate authentic security and red tape.

As a result, credit to the private sector stands at about 8% of the gross domestic product, below the sub-Saharan Africa average.

“The Government should continue with tight fiscal policies and prudent employment of liquidity sterilisation instruments, which led to moderate easing of the interest rates in the first half of 2006,” Obonyo said.

The flooding of the market with counterfeit products limits the market for legitimate business entities, undermining investment and killing innovation in the long run.

“Intellectual property laws should be strengthened and enforced. The Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) and the Uganda National Bureau of Standards should continue destroying such goods, apply punitive measures and use whistle-blowers,” he said.

Processing duty draw backs is still a long process, taking three months.

Obonyo said the URA should improve the efficiency of refunding Value Added Tax.

The 15% contribution from employers and employees to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) is too high and reduces employees’ income. He said the NSSF contribution should not exceed 10%.

Obonyo added that the NSSF certificate should be used be as collateral to improve the use of savings, while the management of pensions should be liberalised for the members to maximise returns.

“The proposed social health insurance scheme of 8% would lead to further increment in the cost of doing business and reduce employees’ incomes,” he said.

“Adequate consultation for the proposed social health insurance scheme should be done. The Government should recognise the existing private medical insurance schemes by setting up a regulatory authority to monitor and control their effectiveness,” Obonyo said.

 
WHAT IS DRIVING OIL PRICES HIGH PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
What is driving oil prices so high?
Crude oil prices have surged to record levels of over $72 a barrel - a rise of more than 18% in 2006, and a threefold gain over the past three years.

Oil refinery in Colombia
No sign yet of oil prices dropping back to earth

The effect is to heighten fears about inflation in importing countries - and to exacerbate international tensions.

The price of US-traded light, sweet crude hit a record of $72.40 on 19 April, while UK-traded Brent crude from the North Sea has raced to an all-time high of $74.

BBC News looks at the factors that are driving oil prices higher.

RISING DEMAND

The biggest catalyst for oil's seemingly remorseless rise in recent years has been the simplest economic driver there is: the balance between demand and a supply.

For starters, oil demand is at an all-time high.

The big change has been the continued breakneck economic expansion of the developing world's biggest economies, India and China.

With more than a billion people each, and sustained annual growth rates of 7% in India and 9% in China, manufacturers and consumers are sucking in energy at an ever-increasing rate.

But on top of that, there is little sign that demand from industrialised countries is flagging. In the US in particular, the gas-guzzling Sports Utility Vehicle (SUV) still dominates the car market. Economic growth rates, already strong in the US, are likely to pick up in Europe this year.

Oil producers' group Opec says demand is up a million barrels a day over the past year - a little more than 1%.

But some projections suggest that over the next quarter of a century, demand could soar from the current 90 million barrels a day to as much as 140 million.

SECURITY FEARS

More recently, though, security threats to the world oil supply have risen up the agenda.

Predictions that Iraq's oil production would increase dramatically following the US-led invasion of Iraq have proved over-optimistic due to the deteriorating security situation in that country.

Nigeria, another key member of oil producers' group Opec, has its own security problems. Much of its oil comes from the Niger Delta region, and local activists demanding a bigger share of revenues have repeatedly shut down production, invaded platforms and refineries, and even taken foreign workers hostage.

Chinese construction workers
China's booming economy is sucking in a huge amount of oil

Now, though, it is Iran, another of the world's biggest oil producers, which dominates the headlines.

The country's push to acquire nuclear power and, many believe, nuclear weapons has sparked concern in the international community - and raised the spectre that Iran could use its own oil supplies as a bargaining chip at best and a weapon at worst.

And barely-veiled threats from the US suggesting that military action remains a live option have further accentuated fears.

SUPPLY TRENDS

The reason the security concerns play directly onto oil prices is that they threaten supply and roil the oil markets.

But more general supply trends play their own part in pushing up prices.

Big oil companies are having a harder and harder time replenishing their reserves, and must look further afield and in more hard-to-reach locations.

At the same time, calls for more efficient use of resources and better returns for shareholders has led them to run down stocks - and push the construction of new refineries down their agenda.

The result has been to tighten supply just as demand has soared.

A more controversial concern is the so-called "peak oil" theory: the idea that the world has reached the natural limits of oil exploitation, and that there is little more to be found in the ground whatever the price.

Although many in the business dismiss the concept, energy planners in several countries are nonetheless beginning to take it into account.

SUPPLIERS' STRATEGIES

Most of the headlines about oil prices look at the issue from the consumption perspective: the pain which high energy costs is causing.

But on the other side of the fence, producers are having a wonderful time.

In South America, for instance, oil revenues are underpinning President Hugo Chavez's efforts to reshape Venezuela, allowing him to fund extensive social programmes and reject US criticism of his economic policies.

Opec, the source of about a third of the world's oil, has a theoretical target price of about $30 a barrel for oil - but Mr Chavez thinks his fellow member states should push that up to $50.

And apart from Saudi Arabia, which remains by far the world's biggest supplier, few in Opec have either much of a stomach for increasing production - or much capacity to spare.

Meanwhile, outside Opec, Russia's oil and gas bonanza has underwritten efforts by President Vladimir Putin to centralise and even renationalise the country's energy sector.

And several African countries are riding high on oil demand.

The tiny states of Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome & Principe are high on the list of popular destinations for oil firms these days - although their populations seem unlikely to see the kind of benefits that many Venezuelans are now enjoying.

 
UK TOPS ENERGY WASTERS LEAGUE PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
UK 'tops energy wasters league'
Standby button (BBC)
Any device with a remote consumes electricity when on standby
Britons are the worst energy wasters in Europe with bad habits which could cost £11bn by 2010, a survey of Europe's five most populous nations suggests.

Leaving mobile phone chargers plugged in, appliances on standby and lights on are among their most common failings.

If the levels of wastage continue, an extra 43m tonnes of carbon dioxide will be pumped into the atmosphere by then, the Energy Saving Trust said.

It interviewed 5,000 people in the UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy.

Figures in the Habits of a Lifetime report, commissioned to mark the start of Energy Saving Week, said 71% of UK consumers admit to leaving standby buttons on once a week.

Meanwhile, 65% of UK consumers leave chargers on once a week and 63% forget to switch the lights off when leaving the room.

ENERGY WASTERS' LEAGUE
1. UK
2. Italy
3. France
4. Spain
5. Germany
Source: Energy Saving Trust

The comparison with German consumers, who top the energy efficiency league, reveals major differences.

Britons leave chargers on three times as much as Germans, they leave standby buttons on twice as much and forget to switch off lights four times as much.

Almost half (48%) of Britons admit to using the car for short journeys rather than public transport, walking or cycling.

The Spanish were said to be the next most efficient users of energy after Germany, followed by France and Italy.

Gender gap

Philip Sellwood, EST chief executive, said: "As a result of this research, we are calling on the nation to undertake a series of daily habit-changing actions during energy saving week.

As a result of this research, we are calling on the nation to undertake a series of daily habit-changing actions during Energy Saving Week
Philip Sellwood, EST chief executive

"It is clear from the study we can't band everyone as 'a consumer'. The aim will be to galvanise the nation into breaking their energy habits one by one."

Within the UK, a number of interesting statistics emerged concerning age and gender.

Both men and women admitted about 32 energy wasting actions per week although 20% of males felt no guilt compared with 9% of the opposite sex.

Mild guilt

The survey found 27% of those aged 65 and over felt no guilt about the energy they use and its impact on the local environment.

WASTEFUL HABITS
Leaving devices on standby
Leaving chargers plugged in
Forgetting to turn off lights

According to interviews with their parents, 72% of children aged 16 and under regularly leave the lights on and almost two-thirds always leave computers, TVs and stereos on standby.

However, about a quarter of 18 to 24-year-olds do feel moderately guilty about the impact their energy use has on the environment.

More than half of those surveyed (57%) said they would support the government introducing "environmental health" warnings on products which are not energy efficient while 49% believe more advice on energy efficiency should be available.

'Rising emissions'

Friends of the Earth, meanwhile, has called on more action from the government on climate change.

"We're not going to save the world by turning our TVs off standby," said the lobby group's parliamentary campaigner Martyn Williams.

According to FoE analysis of official data, UK carbon dioxide emissions rose in the first half of the year and are higher than when Labour came to power in 1997.

The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the UK has one of the best records of any country in tackling emissions.

"We are on target to cut CO2 emissions by 16% by 2010, but accept we need to do more to meet our 20% domestic target by 2010," a spokesman said.

"That is why we introduced new policies and measures. These will take time to kick in but by 2010 they will be delivering reductions."

 


 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Results 10 - 18 of 23

Our Members

Energy Regulatory Authority (ERA)

Makerere University Kampala

Eskom Ltd

Kakira Sugar Works Ltd

Kenol Kobil

Rural Electrification Agency (REA),

Umeme Ltd,

Uganda Electricity Transmission Company (UETCL),
 

You are here  :Home arrow Newsroom and Events